Why Quest 3 is Better Than Apple Vision Pro? Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg Said


The battle for supremacy in the mixed reality headset market is heating up, with tech giants Meta and Apple unveiling their latest offerings – Quest 3 is Better Than Apple Vision Pro, respectively. As the two companies vie for consumer attention and market share, their chief executives have taken to the stage to tout the superiority of their products. Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Meta, has been particularly vocal in his assessment, claiming that the Quest 3 outperforms the Apple Vision Pro in several key areas.

In a recent interview, Zuckerberg outlined the reasons why he believes the Quest 3 is the better choice for consumers. From comfort and ergonomics to content library and pricing, Zuckerberg made a compelling case for Meta’s latest virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) headset. In this article, we’ll delve into Zuckerberg’s claims and examine the features that set the Quest 3 apart from its Apple counterpart.

Recent Released:What Is Omnipod 5 iOS App Release Date?

Comfort and Ergonomics: The Quest 3’s Lightweight Design

One of the primary advantages Zuckerberg highlighted for the Quest 3 is Better Than Apple Vision Pro is its lightweight and comfortable design. According to the Meta CEO, the Quest 3 weighs 120 grams less than the Apple Vision Pro, making it more comfortable to wear for extended periods. This is a crucial factor in mixed reality experiences, where users often find themselves immersed for hours at a time.

Zuckerberg also noted that the Quest 3’s lack of a wired battery pack contributes to its ergonomic superiority. Unlike the Vision Pro, which requires a separate battery pack tethered to the headset, the Quest 3’s battery is integrated into the device, allowing for greater freedom of movement. This untethered design enables users to move more naturally and engage in physical activities without the encumbrance of external hardware.

Input Methods: Hand Tracking and Physical Controllers

Another area where Zuckerberg believes the Quest 3 excels is in its input methods. The headset offers both physical hand controllers and advanced hand tracking capabilities, allowing users to interact with virtual environments using natural hand gestures. Zuckerberg argues that this approach is more intuitive and immersive than the Vision Pro’s reliance on eye tracking for input.

While eye tracking can be useful for certain applications, Zuckerberg contends that physical hand controllers and hand tracking provide a more comprehensive and engaging experience, particularly for gaming and productivity tasks. The ability to manipulate virtual objects with one’s hands adds a level of realism and precision that is difficult to replicate with eye tracking alone.

Expansive Content Library and Affordable Pricing

One of the most compelling arguments Zuckerberg presented in favor of the Quest 3 is Better Than Apple Vision Pro is its extensive content library and significantly lower price point compared to the Apple Vision Pro. With a price tag of $500, the Quest 3 is a fraction of the cost of the $3,500 Vision Pro, making it more accessible to a broader range of consumers.

Zuckerberg emphasized that the Quest 3’s lower price point and robust content ecosystem make it better suited for the vast majority of mixed reality use cases, such as gaming, socializing, and fitness applications. The Meta CEO argued that the Quest 3’s deep immersive content library, coupled with its affordability, positions it as the superior choice for most consumers.

Field of View and Immersion

In addition to its comfortable design and input methods, Zuckerberg highlighted the Quest 3’s wider field of view as another advantage over the Apple Vision Pro. A broader field of view enhances the sense of immersion and presence in virtual environments, providing a more engaging and realistic experience.

Zuckerberg acknowledged that the Vision Pro had to make tradeoffs to achieve its high-resolution microLED displays, which resulted in compromises in other areas, such as field of view and ergonomics. By prioritizing immersion and comfort, the Quest 3 aims to deliver a more well-rounded mixed reality experience.

Open vs. Closed Ecosystem

Beyond the hardware specifications and features, Zuckerberg also touched upon the philosophical differences between Meta’s and Apple’s approaches to mixed reality ecosystems. He expressed his belief that Meta’s open app model, which allows developers to create and distribute applications freely, will ultimately prevail over Apple’s closed ecosystem in the next generation of computing.

Zuckerberg argued that an open platform fosters innovation and creativity, enabling a diverse range of developers to contribute to the mixed reality landscape. In contrast, he suggested that Apple’s closed model could stifle innovation and limit consumer choice.

Useful Table: Quest 3 vs. Vision Pro Comparison

To provide a clear overview of the key differences between the Quest 3 and the Apple Vision Pro, here’s a useful table summarizing the key points made by Zuckerberg:

FeatureQuest 3Vision Pro
Weight120 grams lighterHeavier
Battery PackIntegratedExternal wired pack
Input MethodsHand controllers, hand trackingEye tracking
Field of ViewWiderNarrower
Content LibraryExtensiveLimited


Mark Zuckerberg’s remarks highlight Meta’s confidence in the Quest 3’s ability to outperform the Apple Vision Pro in several crucial areas. From its lightweight and comfortable design to its expansive content library and affordable pricing, the Quest 3 aims to provide a more accessible and immersive mixed reality experience.

While the Vision Pro boasts impressive technical specifications, such as high-resolution microLED displays, Zuckerberg argues that the tradeoffs made to achieve these features ultimately detract from the overall user experience. By prioritizing comfort, ergonomics, and an open ecosystem, the Quest 3 positions itself as a more well-rounded and consumer-friendly option.

Ultimately, the battle between the Quest 3 and the Vision Pro will be decided by consumers’ preferences and priorities. Those seeking cutting-edge display technology and immersive entertainment experiences may gravitate towards the Vision Pro, while those prioritizing affordability, comfort, and a diverse content library may find the Quest 3 more appealing.

As the mixed reality market continues to evolve, it will be fascinating to observe how these competing philosophies and approaches shape the future of this burgeoning technology. Regardless of which device emerges as the leader, the competition between Meta and Apple is sure to drive innovation and push the boundaries of what is possible in the realm of virtual and augmented reality.

Leave a Comment